Characterization and ecological significance of a seed bank from the Upper Pennsylvanian Wise Formation, southwest Virginia
 
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Biological Sciences, East Tennessee State University, PO Box 70300, Johnson City, TN 37614, USA
 
2
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Texas of the Permian Basin, 4901 E. University, Odessa, TX 79762, USA
 
3
Associate Vice President, Office of Research and Sponsored Programs, California State University, Titan Hall, 2nd Floor, 1121 North State College Blvd., Fullerton, CA 9283, USA
 
 
Online publication date: 2017-12-19
 
 
Publication date: 2017-12-19
 
 
Acta Palaeobotanica 2017; 57(2): 165-175
 
ABSTRACT
Soil seed banks are important to the maintenance and restoration of floras. Extant seed banks exhibit unique characteristics with regard to the distribution of seed size and seed density. Seeds were recovered from the Upper Pennsylvanian Wise Formation in southwest Virginia. Structurally preserved seeds were also examined from coal balls of the Pennsylvanian Pottsville and Allegheny Groups, Ohio. The size distribution of the seeds from the Wise Formation is similar to that of structurally preserved seeds of the Upper Pennsylvanian Pottsville and Allegheny Group coal balls. In contrast, the seed size distributions in extant wetland, grassland, woodland and forest habitats are significantly narrower than that of seeds from the Pennsylvanian seed banks. Larger seeds are less dependent on light for germination, and aid in seedling establishment more than smaller seeds, especially in dense stable forests where disturbance events are rare. Large seed size may contribute to increased seed longevity, which reduces the effect of environmental variability on seed germination and development. The significantly larger size of the Palaeozoic seeds may have imparted an advantage for seedling establishment in the dense Palaeozoic forests. The preponderance of large seeds may be a result of the absence of large seed predators (e.g. herbivorous tetrapods), and may have been an evolutionary strategy to minimize damage to the embryo from a predator population dominated by small invertebrates with chewing or sucking mouthparts. The estimated seed density of 192 seeds/m2 in the Palaeozoic seed bank falls within the range of modern seed banks, but at the lower end of modern seed bank densities in a variety of habitats.
 
REFERENCES (71)
1.
Arnold C.A. 1938. Paleozoic seeds. Bot. Rev., 4: 205–234.
 
2.
Baldwin A.H., Egnotovich M.S. & Clarke E. 2001. Hydrologic change and vegetation of tidal freshwater marshes: field, greenhouse, and seed-bank experiments. Wetlands, 21(4): 519–531.
 
3.
Baker H.G. 1972. Seed Weight in Relation to Environmental Conditions in California. Ecology, 53: 997–1010.
 
4.
Baskin C.C. & Baskin J.M. 1998. SEEDS: Ecology, Biogeography and evolution of dormancy and germination. Academic Press Inc., San Diego, CA, USA.
 
5.
Bekker R.N, Backer J.P, Grandin U, Kalamees R., Melberg P., Poschlod P., Thomson K. & Willems J. 1998. Seed size, shape and vertical distribution in the soil; Indicators of longevity. Funct. Ecol., 12: 834–842.
 
6.
Benvenuti S. 2007a. Weed seed movement and dispersal strategies in the agricultural environment. Weed Biol. Manag., 7: 141–157.
 
7.
Benvenuti S. 2007b. Natural weed seed burial: effect of soil texture, rain and seed characteristics. Seed Sci. Res., 17: 211–219.
 
8.
Boccanelli S.I. & Lewis J.P. 1994. The seed bank of an old Pampean prairie and its relation with the standing vegetation. Pesqui. Agropecu. Bras., 29: 1833–1840.
 
9.
Bossuyt B., Stichelmans E. & Hoffmann M. 2005. The importance of seed bank knowledge for the restoration of coastal plant communities – a case study of salt marshes and dune slacks at the Belgian coast: 269–278. In: Herrier J.-L. et al. (ed.) Proceedings ‘Dunes and Estuaries 2005’: International Conference on nature restoration practices in European coastal habitats, Koksijde, Belgium 19–23 September 2005. VLIZ Special Publication, 19.
 
10.
Dalling J.W. & Denslow J.S. 1998. Soil seed bank composition along a forest chronosequence in seasonally moist tropical forest, Panama. J. Veg. Sci., 9(5): 669–678.
 
11.
Dalling J.W., Swaine M.D. & Garwood N.C. 1997. Soil seed bank community dynamics in seasonally moist lowland tropical forest, Panama. J. Trop. Ecol., 13(5): 659–680.
 
12.
Darwin C. 1859. On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in theStruggle for Life, 1st edn. John Murray, London.
 
13.
Decocq G., Valentin B., Toussaint B., Hendoux F., Saguez R. & Bardat J. 2004. Soil seed bank composition and diversity in a managed temperate deciduous forest. Biodivers. Conserv., 13(13): 2485–2509.
 
14.
DiMichele W.A., Phillips T.L. & Pfefferkorn H.W. 2006. Paleoecology of Late Paleozoic pteridosperms from tropical Euramerica. J. Torrey Bot. Soc., 133: 83–118.
 
15.
Eby J.B., Campbell M.R., Stose G.W. & Pederson F.C. 1923. The geology and mineral resources of Wise County and the coal-bearing portion of Scott County, Virginia. Bulletin Virginia Geological Society, No. 24, University of Virginia.
 
16.
Enright N.J. & Cameron E.K. 1988. The soil seed bank of a kauri (Agathis australis) forest remnant near Auckland, New Zealand. New Zealand J. Bot., 26(2): 223, 236.
 
17.
Eriksson O., Friis E.M., Lofgren P. 2000. Seed size, fruit size and Dispersal systems in Angiosperms from Cretaceous to the late Tertiary. Am. Nat., 156: 47–58.
 
18.
Foster S. & Janson C.H. 1985. The relationship between seed size and establishment conditions in tropical woody plants. Ecology, 773–780.
 
19.
Galatowitsch S.M. & van der Valk A.G. 1996. The Vegetation of Restored and Natural Prairie Wetlands. Ecol. Appl., 6: 102–112.
 
20.
Garwood N.C. 1989. Tropical soil seed banks: a review: 149–209. In: Leck M., Parker V. & Simpson R. (eds), Ecology of soil seed banks, Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
 
21.
Gosdefroid S., Phartyal S.S. & Koedam N. 2006. Depth distribution and composition of seed banks under different tree layers in a managed temperate forest ecosystem. Acta Oecol., 29: 283–292.
 
22.
Gross K.L. 1990. A Comparison of Methods for Estimating Seed Numbers in the Soil. J. Ecol., 78: 1079–1093.
 
23.
Hall J.B. & Swaine M.D. 1980. Seed stocks in Ghanaian forest soils. The Association for Tropical Biology and Conservation, 12: 256–263.
 
24.
Hammer O. 1999–2016. PAST Paleontological statistics. Natural History Museum, University of Oslo, Norway, 1–252.
 
25.
Harper J.L., Lovell P.H. & Moore KG. 1970. The shape and sizes of seeds. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 1: 327–356.
 
26.
Henderson C.B., Petersen K.E. & Redak R.A. 1979. Spatial and Temporal Patterns in the Seed Bank and Vegetation of a Desert Grassland Community. J. Ecol., 76: 717–728.
 
27.
Hopfensperger K.N. 2007. A review of similarity between seed bank and standing vegetation across ecosystems. Oikos, 9: 1438–1448.
 
28.
Hopkins D.R. & Graham A.W. 1983. The species composition of Soil seed Banks Beneath lowland tropical rainforests in North Queensland, Australia. Biotropica, 15(2): 90–99.
 
29.
Hopkins D.R. & Parker V.T. 1984. A Study of the Seed Bank of a Salt Marsh in Northern San Francisco Bay. Am. J. Bot., 71: 348–355.
 
30.
Johnson R.G. & Anderson R.C. 1986. The seed bank of a tall grass prairie in Illinois. Am. Midl.Naturalist, 123–130.
 
31.
Kramer N.B & Johnson F.D. 1987. Mature forest seed banks of three habitat types in central Idaho. Can. J. Bot., 65: 1961–1966.
 
32.
Korb J.E., Springer J.D., Powers S.R. & Moore M.M. 2005. Soil seed banks in Pinus ponderosa forests in Arizona: clues to site history and restoration potential. App. Veget. Sci., 8(1): 103–112.
 
33.
Labandeira C. 1998. Plant-insect associations from the fossil record. Geotimes, 43(9): 18–24.
 
34.
Labandeira C. 2007. The origin of herbivory on land: initial patterns of plant tissue consumption by arthropods. Insect Science, 14(4): 259–275.
 
35.
Labandeira C.C. & Phillips T.L. 1996. A Late Carboniferous petiole gall and the origin of holometabolous insects. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 93: 8470–8474.
 
36.
Lawrence D.R. 1971. The nature and structure of paleoecology. J. Paleontol., 45: 593–607.
 
37.
Leck M.A. & Simpson R.L. 1987. Seed bank of a freshwater tidal wetland: turnover and relationship to vegetation change. Am. J. Bot., 74: 360–370.
 
38.
Leck M.A., Simpson R.L. & Parker V.T. 1989. The seed bank of a freshwater tidal wetland and its relationship to vegetation dynamics: 198–205. In: R.R. Sharitz & J.W. Gibbons (eds). Freshwater Wetlands and Wildlife. USDOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information, Oak Ridge, TN.
 
39.
Leckie S., Vellen M., Bell G.J., Waterway M.J. & Lechowicz M.J. 2000. The seed bank of old-growth temperate deciduous forest. Canadian J. Bot., 78(2): 181–192.
 
40.
Mack A.L. 1998. An Advantage of Large Seed Size: Tolerating Rather than Succumbing to Seed Predators. Biotropica, 30: 604–608.
 
41.
Matlack G.R. & Good R.E. 1990. Spatial Heterogeneity in the Soil Seed Bank of a Mature Coastal Plain Forest. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club, 117: 143–152.
 
42.
Middleton B.A. 1999. Wetland Restoration, Flood Pulsing and Disturbance Dynamics. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
 
43.
Middleton B.A. 2003. Soil seed banks and the potential restoration of forested wetlands after farming. J. App. Ecol., 40: 1025–1034.
 
44.
Mohsenin N.N. 1986. Physical properties of plant and animal materials. Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, New York.
 
45.
Moles A.T. & Drake D.R. 1999. Potential contributions of the seed rain and seed bank to regeneration of native forest under plantation pine in New Zealand. New Zealand J. Bot., 37(1): 83–93.
 
46.
Moles A.T., Ackerly D.D., Webb C.O., Tweddle J.C., Dickie J.B. & Westoby M. 2005. A brief history of seed size. Science, 307: 576–580.
 
47.
Nathan R. & Muller-Landau H.C. 2000. Spatial patterns of seed dispersal, their determinants and consequences for recruitment. Trends Ecol. Evol., 15(7): 278–285.
 
48.
Parker V.T. & Leck M.A. 1985. Relationships of seed banks to plant distribution patterns in a freshwater tidal wetland. Am. J. Bot., 72: 161–174.
 
49.
Pederson R. L. 1981. Seed bank characteristics of the Delta Marsh, Manitoba: applications for wetland management. In Selected proceedings of the Midwest Conference on wetland values and management (pp. 61–69). Navarre, MN, USA: Freshwater Society.
 
50.
Rabinowitz D. 1981. Buried Viable Seeds in a North American Tall-Grass Prairie: The Resemblance of Their Abundance and Composition to Dispersing Seeds. Oikos, 36: 191–195.
 
51.
Rees M. 1996. Evolutionary ecology of seed dormancy and seed size. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond., B, Biol. Sci., 351(1345): 1299–1308.
 
52.
Rothwell G.W. & Scheckler S.E. 1988. Biology of ancestral gymnosperms: 88–134. In: Beck C. (ed.), Origin and Evolution of Gymnosperms, Columbia University Press, New York.
 
53.
Saatkamp A., Poschlod P. & Venable D.L. 2014. The functional role of soil seed banks in natural communities: 263–285. In: Gallagher R.S., (ed.) The Ecology of Regeneration in Plant Communities, 3rd edition, CAB International, Boston MA, 1–320.
 
54.
Schneider R.L. & Sharitz R.R. 1986. Seed bank dynamics in a southeastern riverine swamp. Am. J. Bot., 73: 1022–1030.
 
55.
Schupp E.W., Howe H.F., Augspurger C.K. & Levey D.J. 1989. Arrival and survival in tropical treefall gaps. Ecology, 70: 562–564.
 
56.
Scott A.C. & Taylor T.N. 1983. Plant/animal interactions during the Upper Carboniferous. Bot. Rev., 49: 259–307.
 
57.
Sims H.J. 2012. The evolutionary diversification of seed size: using the past to understand the present. Evolution, 66: 1636–1649.
 
58.
Sues H.D. & Reisz R.R. 1998. Origins and early evolution of herbivory in tetrapods. Trees, 3: 141–145.
 
59.
Tiffney B.H. 1984. Seed size, dispersal syndromes, and the rise of the angiosperms: evidence and hypothesis. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard., 71: 551–576.
 
60.
Titus J.H. & Titus P.J. 2008. Seedbank of Bingham Cienega, a Spring-Fed Marsh, In Southeastern Arizona. The Southwestern Naturalist, 53: 393–399.
 
61.
Thompson K. 1987. Seeds and seed banks. New Phytologist (suppl.), 106: 23–34.
 
62.
Thompson K., Band S.R. & J.G. Hodgson. 1993. Seed size and shape predict persistence in soil. Funct. Ecol., 7: 236–241.
 
63.
Tu M., Titus J.H., Tsuyuzaki S. & del Moral R. 1998. Composition and dynamics of wetland seed banks on Mount St. Helens, Washington, USA. Folia Geobot., 33: 3–16.
 
64.
Turnbull L.A., Rees M. & Crawley M.J. 1999. Seed mass and the competition/colonization trade-off: a sowing experiment. J. Ecol., 87(5): 899–912.
 
65.
Van der Valk A.G. & Davis C.B. 1978. The role of seed banks in the vegetation dynamics of prairie glacial marshes. Ecology, 59: 322–335.
 
66.
Van Ulft L.H. 2004. The effect of seed mass and gap size on seed fate of tropical rain forest tree species in Guyana. Plant Biol., 6: 214–221.
 
67.
Warr S.J., Kent M. & Thompson K. 1994. Seed bank composition and variability in five woodlands in south-west England. J. Biogeogr., 21: 151–168.
 
68.
Wassie A. & Teketay D. 2006. Soil seed banks in church forests of northern Ethiopia: Implications for the conservation of woody plants. Flora-Morphology, Distribution, Functional Ecology of Plants, 201(1): 32–43.
 
69.
Westoby M., Leishman M., Lord J., Poorter H. & Schoen D.J. 1996. Comparative ecology of seed size and dispersal [and Discussion]. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond., B, Biol. Sci., 351: 1309–1318.
 
70.
Yu S., Sternberg M., Kutiel P. & Chen H. 2007. Seed mass, shape, and persistence in the soil seed bank of Israeli coastal sand dune flora. Evol. Ecol. Res., 9: 325–340.
 
71.
Zobel M., Kalamees R., Kersti P. Roosaluste E. & Moora M. 2007. Soil seed bank and vegetation in mixed coniferous forest stands with different disturbance regimes. For. Ecol. Manage., 250: 71–76.
 
 
CITATIONS (3):
1.
Physical Properties of Seeds of Eleven Spruce Species
Zdzisław Kaliniewicz, Zbigniew Żuk, Elżbieta Kusińska
Forests
 
2.
Aspects of the Process of Sorting European Black Pine Seeds
Kaliniewicz, Tylek
Forests
 
3.
Possible earliest evidence of insect pollination based on a new species of the Carboniferous medullosalean ‘seed’ genus Pachytesta
Bruno Vallois, André Nel
Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology
 
eISSN:2082-0259
ISSN:0001-6594
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top