Relationships between ecosystems
and plant assemblages as responses
to environmental conditions
in the Lower Jurassic of Hungary and Romania
More details
Hide details
1
Hungarian Natural History Museum, Botanical Department, H-1476 Budapest, P.O. Box 222, Hungary
2
W. Szafer Institute of Botany, Polish Academy of Sciences, Lubicz 46, 31-512 Kraków, Poland
3
University of Bucharest, Faculty of Geology and Geophysics, Laboratory of Palaeontology,
N. Bălcescu Ave. 1, 010041 Bucharest, Romania
4
Jagiellonian University, Botanical Garden, Kopernika 27, 31-501 Kraków, Poland
5
Eötvös Loránd University, Department of Palaeontology, 1117 Budapest, Pázmány Péter sétány 1/C,
Hungary
6
Hungarian Geological and Geophysical Institute, Geological and Geophysical Collections,
1143 Budapest, Stefánia út 14, Hungary
7
Department of Palaeobotany and Palaeoherbarium, Institute of Botany, Jagiellonian University,
Lubicz 46, 31-512 Kraków, Poland
Online publication date: 2015-06-23
Publication date: 2015-06-23
Acta Palaeobotanica 2015; 55(1): 3-17
ABSTRACT
Two Early Jurassic localities, the Mecsek Mts in Hungary and Anina in Romania, are similarly
significant and both floras are of autochthonous/paraautochthonous origin. In the Early Jurassic the Hungarian
locality was a delta plain; the Romanian locality was an intramontane depression filled predominantly by
a braided river system. The floristic composition of the two localities (52 genera, 120 species), although superficially
similar (25 common genera), differs at species level (only 9 common species) as well as in the proportions
of taxa in major plant groups. These differences can be explained by differences in environmental conditions
resulting from palaeogeographic and topographic factors. Based on previous and recent studies, alpha diversity
as well as statistically (DCA, PCA) differentiated ecogroups are compared and discussed. For common species,
the GLM method was used to classify them to particular environmental response types. Their environmental
requirements in both ecosystems are evaluated. Some of the shared species showed different preferences at the
localities, explainable by their broad ecological tolerance.
CITATIONS (7):
1.
Cuticular structure of Storgaardia Harris from the Middle Jurassic of Northwest China and its systematic and biogeographical significances
Qi-Jia Li, Peng-Cheng An, Jun Li, Zhen-Rui Zhao, Jing-Yu Wu, Yong-Dong Wang, Yu-Ting Zhu, Su-Ting Ding
Palaeoworld
2.
Changes in terrestrial floras at the Triassic-Jurassic Boundary in Europe
Maria Barbacka, Grzegorz Pacyna, Ádam Kocsis, Agata Jarzynka, Jadwiga Ziaja, Emese Bodor
Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology
3.
Ferns of the Lower Jurassic from the Mecsek Mountains (Hungary): taxonomy and palaeoecology
Maria Barbacka, Evelyn Kustatscher, Emese Bodor
PalZ
4.
Bennettitales in the Rhaetian flora of Wüstenwelsberg, Bavaria, Germany
Christian Pott, Stefan Schmeißner, Günter Dütsch, Konijnenburg-van Van
Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology
5.
Leonophyllum tenellum nov. gen., nov. sp., an enigmatic plant from the Early Jurassic of the Mecsek Mts (Hungary)
Maria Barbacka, Grzegorz Pacyna, Artur Górecki, Evelyn Kustatscher
Geobios
6.
A quantitative approach for identifying plant ecogroups in the Romanian Early Jurassic terrestrial vegetation
Maria Barbacka, Mihai Popa, Józef Mitka, Emese Bodor, Zoltán Püspöki, Richard McIntosh
Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology
7.
The Relationship Between Normal-range Ejection Fraction and Diastolic Function
Mustafa Yılmaz, Mehmet Rasih Sonsöz
Journal of Academic Research in Medicine